'Creatures Of Each Other?' 
Reflections On The Mutuality Of The Construction Of Boundaries/Barriers

Conference, Audio, Video or Powerpoint Presentation

Title: 'Creatures Of Each Other?' Reflections On The Mutuality Of The Construction Of Boundaries/Barriers Between Society And The Mentally Ill
Year: 2002
Authors: Comerford, H.

This paper evokes events at a psychiatric day clinic as illustrative of a theory that whilst on the conscious level the aim of community psychiatry is the care and rehabilitatation of people with mental illness its unconscious function is to fashion a barrier of mystification and separation between public and patient.

This clinic was the subject of a doctorate and a book (“From Asylum to Anarchy”) by Claire Baron. Though the only observable “anarchy” was organisational, arising from the staff group of the Day Clinic enacting an omnipotent group phantasy, Baron evokes the vulnerability, fragmentation and need for structure of the patients in her argument for increased administrative hegemony and the curtailing of professional autonomy. That the patients’ behaviour throughout the affair was constructive, appropriate and ‘normal’, and judging by the high attendance of this traditionally “hard-to-engage” group “the new venture” was offering something attractive and useful, was lost on participants and subsequent commentators.

From this curious myopia, characteristic of mental health services rhetoric, indicates an unconscious relationship between the experiential framework of patients diagnosed with “serious enduring mental illness” and specific aspects of community psychiatry. I suggest an unconscious phantasy of the broader social milieu – enacted through the service – maintains a status quo through creation of a technologically-validated “otherness” of the mentally ill. The “new venture” at Paddington Day Clinic, in its refusal of this and its attempt to engage with the “other” – both within patients and within the institution - threatened this reassuring cultural phantasy and was terminated by the NHS establishment on the rationale that it was not adequately monitored and controlled. Distancing of the patient was reasserted through intensified organisational technologies of audit, systems governance, hierarchical dominance and justified by definition of the patient as biologically dysfunctional.

These instrumentalising pseudo-scientific technologies in the mental health services, far from moving human relations away from irrationality, reify praxis into process, constructing a new organisational defence against unconscious primitive group anxiety. The contemporary, supposedly rational, scientistic paradigm, based in pharmacological control, systems governance, audit and evidence-based practice is more irrational, more defensive, more ritualistic than were former notions of demonic possession or "illness" involving more – not less – mystification than historically-constructed “otherness” (Ingleby).

Keywords: Mutuality, Boundaries, Barriers, Society, Mentally Ill
Language: English

Date: 6/20/2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Name of Event/Conference: 19th Annual Meetings of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations
Sponsoring Organization: ISPSO

Submitted by:
Elizabeth Novogratz

Corresponding author:

Literature Download:

By downloading the file you agree to comply with the Terms of Use / Guidelines of the ISPSO Library and the copyright/authority information for this Literature (above).

If there is no filename in a link below then a download has not been provided.
Members-only Downloads are via the members-only zone of the website.

External website Download

Local Download

No files attached to this page.

Members-only Download

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License