Reply to discussants

Journal Article or Monograph

Title: Reply to discussants
Year: 2003
Authors: Eisold, K.

This is a difficult topic for psychoanalysts. For one thing, most of us are not trained to think about larger social systems, such as organizations, much less professions. As Marylou Lionells notes, it is easy to feel unsure of our intellectual footing in this area. For another, we are in the midst of the topic we are trying to think about. This is always difficult, as we know from our clinical work. But it is doubly difficult in this case because there has been so much mystification in the discussions we have had on the topic of our professional identity - and so much anxiety.

The discussants of my paper make it clear that they are by no means complacent defenders of the status quo. I am deeply heartened by their thoughtful responses, not only to my paper, but also to the many troubling issues we face collectively as psychoanalysts. I have the sense that more and more individuals are engaging this urgent task of probing our professional shortcomings and failures. All the more

Keywords: Psychoanalysis, Profession, Fragmentation, Validation, Ambiguous goals
Language: English

Journal: Contemporary Psychoanalysis
Volume: 39
Issue: 00
Start page: 629
End page: 636
Publisher ID:

Submitted by:
Anne C. Fruge
Faculty and Supervisor
The William Alanson White Institute

Corresponding author: Kenneth Eisold

Literature Download:

By downloading the file you agree to comply with the Terms of Use / Guidelines of the ISPSO Library and the copyright/authority information for this Literature (above).

If there is no filename in a link below then a download has not been provided.
Members-only Downloads are via the members-only zone of the website.

External website Download

Local Download

No files attached to this page.

Members-only Download

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License